Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748019›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Long-term cognitive and functional status in Danish ICU patients with COVID-19.

Sarah Weihe, Camilla B Mortensen, Nicolai Haase, Lars P K Andersen, Thomas Mohr, Hanna Siegel, Michael Ibsen, Vibeke R L Jørgensen, David L Buck, Helle B S Pedersen and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Sarah WeiheCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-3408
Camilla B MortensenCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5202-3552
Nicolai HaaseDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars P K AndersenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas MohrDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanna SiegelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael IbsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Vibeke R L JørgensenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David L BuckDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark.
Helle B S PedersenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.
Henrik P PedersenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Susanne IversenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Niels RibergaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hjørring Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Bodil S RasmussenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-145X
Robert WindingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Ulrick S EspelundDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Horsens Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.
Helle BundgaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Randers Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Christoffer G SøllingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ricardo S GarciaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Esbjerg Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Anne C BrøchnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.
Jens MichelsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
George MichaginDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.
Lynge KirkegaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aabenraa Hospital, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Anders PernerDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole MathiesenCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Lone M PoulsenCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundICU admission due to COVID-19 may result in cognitive and physical impairment. We investigated the long-term cognitive and physical status of Danish ICU patients with COVID-19.

methodsWe included all patients with COVID-19 admitted to Danish ICUs between March 10 and May 19, 2020. Patients were the contacted prospectively at 6 and 12 months for follow-up. Our primary outcomes were cognitive function and frailty at 6 and 12 months after ICU admission, estimated by the Mini Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and the Clinical Frailty Scale. Secondary outcomes were 6- and 12-month mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessed by EQ-5D-5L, functional status (Barthel activities of daily living and Lawton-Brody instrumental activities of daily living), and fatigue (Fatigue Assessment Scale). The study had no information on pre-ICU admission status for the participants.

resultsA total of 326 patients were included. The 6- and 12-month mortality was 37% and 38%, respectively. Among the 204 six-month survivors, 105 (51%) participated in the 6-month follow-up; among the 202 twelve-month survivors, 95 (47%) participated in the 12-month follow-up. At 6 months, cognitive scores indicated impairment for 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4-12.4) and at 12 months for 17% (95% CI, 12.0-12.8) of participants. Frailty was indicated in 20% (95% CI, 3.4-3.9) at 6 months, and for 18% (95% CI, 3.3-3.8) at 12 months. Fatigue was reported by 52% at 6 months, and by 47% at 12 months. For HRQoL, moderate, severe, or extreme health problems were reported by 28% at 6 months, and by 25% at 12 months.

conclusionLong-term cognitive, functional impairment was found in up to one in four of patients surviving intensive care for COVID-19. Fatigue was present in nearly half the survivors at both 6 and 12 months. However, pre-ICU admission status of the patients was unknown.

Indexed as

COVID-19FrailtyActivities of Daily LivingCognitionDenmarkFatigueFunctional StatusHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesQuality of Lifecognitivecovid-19fatiguefollow-upfrailtyfunctionalintensive care

Identifiers

PMID35748019
PMCPMC9350352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.