ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2022
Fast Neuro: A Care Model to Expedite Access to Neurology Clinic.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Downstream Revenue Generated After Visits to Neurologists: A Claims-Based Analysis of Medicare Data.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- A Novel Approach to Care Redesign Collaboration Between Emergency and Specialty Departments: Qualitative Experience Report.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A palliative care rapid access clinic reduces emergency department visits: a retrospective single centre analysis.BMC palliative care · 2025Observational
- Article
- Impact of an Electronic Health Record-Based Interruptive Alert Among Patients With Headaches Seen in Primary Care: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Models of care in emergency neurology: from the Neuro Fast Track to the emergency neurologist-a position paper of the Italian Association for Emergency Neurology (ANEU).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Strategies to reduce inappropriate admissions to the neurologic ward: a model of hospital-territory interaction in the management of acute episodes.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Characterization of potentially avoidable neurological emergency department visits at a large urban public hospital.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
- Implementation of a safety program initiative for monitoring infusion disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
- A Retrospective Analysis of Visit Durations and Referral Attendance for Pediatric Ocular Conditions Seen in Emergency and Urgent Care Settings.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: We set out to improve outpatient neurology access while reducing patient volume in the emergency department (ED) for nonemergent neurologic complaints. Methods: We created a rapid access model, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Fast Neuro, for patients referred from affiliated EDs to outpatient neurology, enabling appointments within 1 week of referral. Rapid access appointments were also available to established neurology patients with urgent concerns. Fast Neuro was built to reduce nonemergent neurologic care in the ED, improve outpatient neurology access, and avoid use of inpatient neurology services for nonemergent consults. The volume of referrals and neurology consults from the ED and wait time from referral to appointment were measured. Surveys were conducted at 3 and 6 months to assess satisfaction with the model by all stakeholders. Results: From January 2019 through January 2021, 201 patients were referred to outpatient neurology through UCLA Fast Neuro. Wait time for an outpatient neurology appointment was reduced from the prior period by 82.5% (7.0 ± 5.5 vs 40 ± 4.1 days). The number of nonemergent consults from the ED was reduced by 60% (4.1 ± 1.9/mo vs 10.3 ± 1.7/mo). Surveys showed wide acceptance of the new model with 92% of attending physicians and advanced practice providers and 89% of residents endorsing that UCLA Fast Neuro patients did not detract from their clinic experience. Discussion: UCLA Fast Neuro improved ED throughput, reduced inpatient neurology consults from the ED, and decreased wait times for outpatient neurology appointments without using the inpatient neurology service for nonurgent consults. UCLA Fast Neuro was successful. Exploration of how to scale and implement the model of access more broadly is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.