ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Study on Pear Flowers Detection Performance of YOLO-PEFL Model Trained With Synthetic Target Images.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements and prospects in key technologies for robotic pollination in greenhouse pepper breeding: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- YO-AFD: an improved YOLOv8-based deep learning approach for rapid and accurate apple flower detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- An efficient tomato-detection method based on improved YOLOv4-tiny model in complex environment.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Application of improved YOLOv7-based sugarcane stem node recognition algorithm in complex environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Dragon fruit detection in natural orchard environment by integrating lightweight network and attention mechanism.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Feature extraction of 3D Chinese rose model based on color and shape features.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Detection and localization of citrus fruit based on improved You Only Look Once v5s and binocular vision in the orchard.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection of pear flowers is an important measure for pear orchard yield estimation, which plays a vital role in improving pear yield and predicting pear price trends. This study proposed an improved YOLOv4 model called YOLO-PEFL model for accurate pear flower detection in the natural environment. Pear flower targets were artificially synthesized with pear flower's surface features. The synthetic pear flower targets and the backgrounds of the original pear flower images were used as the inputs of the YOLO-PEFL model. ShuffleNetv2 embedded by the SENet (Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks) module replacing the original backbone network of the YOLOv4 model formed the backbone of the YOLO-PEFL model. The parameters of the YOLO-PEFL model were fine-tuned to change the size of the initial anchor frame. The experimental results showed that the average precision of the YOLO-PEFL model was 96.71%, the model size was reduced by about 80%, and the average detection speed was 0.027s. Compared with the YOLOv4 model and the YOLOv4-tiny model, the YOLO-PEFL model had better performance in model size, detection accuracy, and detection speed, which effectively reduced the model deployment cost and improved the model efficiency. It implied the proposed YOLO-PEFL model could accurately detect pear flowers with high efficiency in the natural environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.