Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747884›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Study on Pear Flowers Detection Performance of YOLO-PEFL Model Trained With Synthetic Target Images.

Chenglin Wang, Yawei Wang, Suchwen Liu, Guichao Lin, Peng He, Zhaoguo Zhang, Yi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chenglin WangFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Yawei WangCollege of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Suchwen LiuCollege of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Guichao LinSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Peng HeSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Zhaoguo ZhangFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Yi ZhouCollege of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection of pear flowers is an important measure for pear orchard yield estimation, which plays a vital role in improving pear yield and predicting pear price trends. This study proposed an improved YOLOv4 model called YOLO-PEFL model for accurate pear flower detection in the natural environment. Pear flower targets were artificially synthesized with pear flower's surface features. The synthetic pear flower targets and the backgrounds of the original pear flower images were used as the inputs of the YOLO-PEFL model. ShuffleNetv2 embedded by the SENet (Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks) module replacing the original backbone network of the YOLOv4 model formed the backbone of the YOLO-PEFL model. The parameters of the YOLO-PEFL model were fine-tuned to change the size of the initial anchor frame. The experimental results showed that the average precision of the YOLO-PEFL model was 96.71%, the model size was reduced by about 80%, and the average detection speed was 0.027s. Compared with the YOLOv4 model and the YOLOv4-tiny model, the YOLO-PEFL model had better performance in model size, detection accuracy, and detection speed, which effectively reduced the model deployment cost and improved the model efficiency. It implied the proposed YOLO-PEFL model could accurately detect pear flowers with high efficiency in the natural environment.

Indexed as

deep learningpear flowers identificationtarget detectionyield estimationYOLOv4

Identifiers

PMID35747884
PMCPMC9209761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.