ArticleActa endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
MEALTIME BOLUS INSULIN DOSE TIMING IN CHILDREN WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES: REAL-LIFE DATA FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN NORTHERN INDIA.
Article in Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Basal-bolus regimen versus twice-daily premixed insulin in the treatment of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus in Mosul City: A comparison study.Problemy endokrinologii · 2026Article
- Optimal Prandial Timing of Insulin Bolus in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Mealtime insulin bolus is traditionally administered before meals in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Controlled studies on the use of pre-and postprandial insulin bolus have shown variable results. There are no real-world studies on postprandial bolusing of insulin in young children with T1D. Methods: Children with T1D aged <7 years were grouped into preprandial (Group 1) or postprandial (Group 2) groups according to the practice of prandial insulin use. Their retrospective data on mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hypoglycemic events, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes were compared. Results: Forty-four children (mean age 4.1±1.3 years, range 2-7 years) with mean diabetes duration of 2.0±0.7 years (range, 1-4 years) were identified; 23 (52.3%) belonged to Group 1 and 21 (47.7%) to Group 2. There were no differences in the mean HbA1c levels, mean hypoglycemic events, and DKA episodes between the two groups during a mean follow-up duration of two years. Conclusion: Young children with T1D administered insulin bolus during or immediately after meals showed similar long-term glycemic control and diabetes-related adverse event profile compared to the premeal timing of insulin bolus. Larger real-world studies are needed on flexible insulin bolus timing in young children with T1D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.