Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747660›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Word of Mouth and Online Reviews Are More Influential Than Social Media for Patients When Selecting a Sports Medicine Physician.

Dylan N Greif, Harsh A Shah, Dylan Luxenburg, Blake H Hodgens, Anabel L Epstein, Lee D Kaplan, Julianne Munoz, Michael Letter, Michael G Baraga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Below-Knee Amputations: A Qualitative Social Media Analysis of Perceived Outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dylan N GreifDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, U.S.A.
Harsh A ShahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Dylan LuxenburgLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Blake H HodgensLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Anabel L EpsteinLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Lee D KaplanUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Julianne MunozUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Michael LetterUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Michael G BaragaUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To (1) identify the percentage of patients seen in an orthopaedic sports medicine practice who use social media and (2) identify the role that social media has in physician selection as compared with other factors. Methods: After institutional review board approval was received, new patients aged 18 years or older who attended a single orthopaedic sports medicine office from February 2020 to May 2021 were identified for inclusion. Sociodemographic information was recorded, and each patient was asked to fill out a questionnaire that assessed social media usage and online resources used to choose and formulate opinions regarding the patient's provider. Results: Two hundred patients met the inclusion criteria and completed the questionnaire. Of these, 96.5% reported social media use. The most common online method of searching for and identifying a physician was Google (50.5%). Social media outlets such as Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn were only used 15.5% of the time to search for and select a physician. Older patients were more likely to use recommendations from friends and family in their consideration when selecting a physician. Conclusions: Despite almost all participants stating that they use social media, only 15.5% of patients reported that they used social media to search for and potentially select their physician. Our study suggests that although social media can be a helpful tool for patient education, other factors such as physician education and physician reputation through word-of-mouth referrals, online reviews, and online ratings seem to play a larger role in the patient's selection of his or her physician. Clinical Relevance: This information may be of value to orthopaedic surgeons looking for ways to build their patient base, online reputation, or other aspects of their practice on the Internet.

Identifiers

PMID35747660
PMCPMC9210471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.