Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747656›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Arthroscopic Treatment Yields Lower Reoperation Rates than Open Treatment for Native Knee but Not Native Shoulder Septic Arthritis.

Ajay S Padaki, Gabrielle C Ma, Nicole M Truong, Charles J Cogan, Drew A Lansdown, Brian T Feeley, C Benjamin Ma, Alan L Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05790434 (Investigation on Diagnostic Criteria for Septic Arthritis：a Multi-center Nested Case-control Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05790434 unknown statusnot on this map

Investigation on Diagnostic Criteria for Septic Arthritis：a Multi-center Nested Case-control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineRan2022 to 2023Enrolled400ConditionsSeptic ArthritisArmsLaboratory test, History taking and physical examination, biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ajay S PadakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Gabrielle C MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Nicole M TruongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Charles J CoganDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Drew A LansdownDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Brian T FeeleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
C Benjamin MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Alan L ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the incidence, patient demographics, complication rates, readmission rates, and reoperation rates of open and arthroscopic surgery performed for septic arthritis in native knee and shoulder joints. Methods: Records of patients who were diagnosed with native knee or shoulder septic arthritis and underwent open or arthroscopic irrigation and debridement (I&D) between 2015 and 2018 were queried from the PearlDiver Mariner Database. International Classification of Diseases 10th (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients and track reoperations. Reoperation procedures, including revision open and arthroscopic I&D, were analyzed at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. Complications, emergency department (ED) admissions, and hospital readmissions within 30 days were analyzed and compared between the open and arthroscopic cohorts. Results: The query resulted with 1,993 patients who underwent knee I&D (75.3% arthroscopic, 24.7% open, Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment carries a lower reoperation rate than open surgery for knee septic arthritis, but in the shoulder, the risk for revision I&D is similar after arthroscopic or open surgery.

Identifiers

PMID35747656
PMCPMC9210470
OpenAlexW4281781715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.