ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2022
The Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Patients with Light-Chain Amyloidosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic factors in Chinese patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: a scoping review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical characteristics and prognosis of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Successful Treatment of Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis with Liver Involvement using Low-Frequency Daratumumab: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Clinical characterization and outcomes of a cohort of colombian patients with AL Amyloidosis.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To retrospectively identify the critical characteristics and prognostic factors of light-chain amyloidosis. PATIENTS AND
methodsData were collected and compared from 91 patients who were diagnosed with light-chain amyloidosis at four hospitals between January 2010 and November 2018. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and performed an overall survival (OS) analysis.
resultsPatients (median age, 60 years) were diagnosed with organ involvement of the kidney (91.2%), heart (56%), liver (14.3%), soft tissue (18.7%), or gastrointestinal tract (15.4%), and 68.1% of patients had more than two organs involved. Patients were most treated with bortezomib-based regimens (56%), and only one patient had autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-ASCT). The median OS was 36.33 months and was influenced by the ECOG score, renal involvement, cardiac involvement, hepatic involvement, and persistence of positive immunofixation. Patients who received bortezomib-based treatment had a trend of favorable OS compared to those who received non-bortezomib-based treatments, but the difference was not statistically significant. Although the overall number of organs involved was not related to OS, the number of organs involved in the heart, liver and kidney was related. Multivariate analysis indicated that cardiac involvement and negative hematologic response with persistence of positive immunofixation were independent prognostic factors for OS.
conclusionCardiac involvement and the hematologic response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS in light-chain amyloidosis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.