Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747549›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2022

Triggers for Referral to Specialized Palliative Care in Advanced Neurologic and Neurosurgical Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Kayla McConvey, Karnig Kazazian, Alla E Iansavichene, Mary E Jenkins, Teneille Emma Gofton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kayla McConveyDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences (KM, KK, MEJ, TEG), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and Library Services (AEI), London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Karnig KazazianDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences (KM, KK, MEJ, TEG), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and Library Services (AEI), London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Alla E IansavicheneDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences (KM, KK, MEJ, TEG), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and Library Services (AEI), London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-1024
Mary E JenkinsDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences (KM, KK, MEJ, TEG), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and Library Services (AEI), London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Teneille Emma GoftonDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences (KM, KK, MEJ, TEG), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and Library Services (AEI), London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To systematically review the literature for the most suitable trigger criteria for referral to specialist palliative care services in life-limiting and life-threatening neurologic and neurosurgical conditions. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990-December 2020). To be included, studies must have trigger/referral criteria clearly outlined, a ≥75% nononcology neurosciences population, and consensus or guidelines documents regarding palliative neurosciences or trigger/referral criteria. We excluded studies that had an oncologic or non-neurosciences population as the main focus of study, trigger and referral criteria not clearly outlined, and no primary or duplicative data. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202013579), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The American Academy of Neurology Results: Our search identified 1,748 publications, of which 22 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were considered in 2 main groups: (A) studies designed specifically to identify trigger criteria for referral to specialized neuropalliative care services (n = 9) and (B) studies that retrospectively reported the reason for referral to specialized palliative care or reflected a consensus statement among people with advanced neurologic illness (n = 13). Overall, the results suggest that several published referral triggers for specialized neuropalliative care are based on expert consensus. However, there is a growing body of literature providing evidence-based condition-specific triggers for multiple sclerosis, parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and dementia. Discussion: There is a growing body of research that outlines evidence-based referral triggers for neuropalliative care. The ambiguity of nomenclature surrounding referral triggers in the current literature and field of neuropalliative care was a limitation to this study. We suggest that condition-specific triggers are likely to be the most effective for identifying the appropriate patients and timing for referral to specialist palliative care. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020135791, crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

Identifiers

PMID35747549
PMCPMC9208418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.