Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747536›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2022

Neurology Access Clinic: A Model to Improve Access to Neurologic Care in an Academic Medical Center.

A J Yarbrough, Leilani Johnson, Anu Vats, Michael S Jaffee, Katharina M Busl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A J YarbroughDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida.
Leilani JohnsonDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida.
Anu VatsDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida.
Michael S JaffeeDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida.
Katharina M BuslDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Delays in access to neurologic care are a major problem. In this pilot program, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel staffing model for neurology outpatient clinic within an academic neurology center to increase access to neurologic care, while incorporating such a model into a growing academic neurology department. Methods: We created a new model for provision of access to neurologic care that could be introduced in an academic neurologic department, the access clinic. One attending was assigned to staff the access clinic for 1 week at a time. This was introduced as rotation equal to conventional on-service inpatient rotations. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the access clinic's performance characteristics. Comparisons were made to the previously established traditional faculty clinic model. Results: A total of 5,917 access clinic visits were compared with 6,000 traditional clinic visits. Lead time dropped from 142 to 18 days for new patients and from 64 to 0 days for return visits. Although total readmission rates were similar during both clinic periods, readmission through the emergency department was less for access clinic patients. The access clinic resulted in significant improvement in patient satisfaction ratings. The access clinic model was financially profitable. Discussion: Our findings suggest that introducing an access clinic as service rotation for neurology faculty is both effective in offering enhanced access for patients to neurologic care and for patient satisfaction. Future studies may test this model in other centers and should address the effect on provider satisfaction.

Identifiers

PMID35747536
PMCPMC9208417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.