Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747499›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review.

Chandrashekhar Pandey, Dinesh Rokaya, Bishwa Prakash Bhattarai

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06041828 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Regular Home-use Dual Light Photodynamic Therapy in the Prevention of Osteolysis After Dental Implant Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorKoite Health OyRan2025 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsOsteolysis, Dental ImplantsArmsLumoral Treatment, Standard oral hygiene
NCT06334770 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on the Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsCompletely Edentulous PatientsArmsRoxolid implants, Titanium implants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Load-To-Failure of Cantilevered Provisional Implant-Supported Prostheses: Conventional Versus 3D-Printed Resins.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandrashekhar PandeyMaster Degree Student in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (International Program), Walailak University International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, 87 Ranong 2 Road, Nakhon Chai Si, Dusit, Bangkok 10300, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1181-7513
Dinesh RokayaDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, Walailak University International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, 87 Ranong 2 Road, Nakhon Chai Si, Dusit, Bangkok 10300, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-667X
Bishwa Prakash BhattaraiDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, Walailak University International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, 87 Ranong 2 Road, Nakhon Chai Si, Dusit, Bangkok 10300, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-9032

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a society highly conscious of esthetics, prosthetic rehabilitation of lost teeth with tissue-integrated implants has gained wide acceptance and demand by patients and clinicians. The backbone of these tissue-integrated implants is the biotechnical process of osseointegration. Although the concept has been introduced and discussed for ages, the deepening knowledge about its cellular and molecular mechanisms has led the researchers to borrow further into the factors influencing the process of osseointegration. This has aided in the hastening and improving the process of osseointegration by exploiting several, even the minutest, details and events taking place in this natural process. Recently, due to the high esthetic expectations of the patients, the implants are being loaded immediately, which demands a high degree of implant stability. Implant stability, especially secondary stability, largely depends on bone formation and integration of implants to the osseous tissues. Various factors that influence the rate and success of osseointegration can either be categorized as those related to implant characteristics like the physical and chemical macro- and microdesign of implants or the bone characteristics like the amount and quality of bone and the local and systemic host conditions, or the time or protocol followed for the functional loading of the dental implant. To address the shortcomings in osseointegration due to any of the factors, it is mandatory that continuous and reliable monitoring of the status of osseointegration is done. This review attempts to encompass the mechanisms, factors affecting, and methods to assess osseointegration, followed by a discussion on the recent advances and future perspectives in dental implantology to enhance the process of osseointegration. The review was aimed at igniting the inquisitive minds to usher further the development of technology that enhances osseointegration.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsTooth LossDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansOsseointegrationOsteogenesisWound HealingDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID35747499
PMCPMC9213185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.