Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747469›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2022

Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters.

Magdalena Rathe, Patricia Hernández-Peña, Claudia Pescetto, Cornelis Van Mosseveld, Maria Angélica Borges Dos Santos, Laura Rivas

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A scoping review and analysis of a series of country experiences to inform the Chilean health financing reform.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena RatheFundación Plenitud Santo Domingo Dominican Republic Fundación Plenitud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Patricia Hernández-PeñaConsultant Amsterdam Netherlands Consultant, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Claudia PescettoPan American Health Organization Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Cornelis Van MosseveldConsultant The Hague Netherlands Consultant, The Hague, Netherlands.
Maria Angélica Borges Dos SantosOswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laura RivasWorld Health Organization Geneva Switzerland World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: (1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; (2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and (3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences.

Indexed as

health expendituresmeasurements, methods, and theoriesPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35747469
PMCPMC9211033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.