ArticleActa radiologica open2022
Iterative reconstruction with multifrequency signal recognition technology to improve low-contrast detectability: A phantom study.
Article in Acta radiologica open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture. Purpose: To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) and conventional IPV. Materials and methods: Low-contrast and water phantoms were used. Helical scans were conducted with the use of a CT scanner with 64 detectors. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp; the tube current was adjusted from 60 to 300 mA with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and from 20 to 150 mA with a slice thickness of 5.0 mm. Images were reconstructed with the FBP, conventional IPV, and IPV-LCD algorithms. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) model was applied in conjunction with the use of low-contrast modules in the low-contrast phantom. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and normalized NPS were calculated. Results: At the same standard and strong levels, the IPV-LCD method improved low-contrast detectability compared with the conventional IPV, regardless of contrast-rod diameters. The mean CHO values at a slice thickness of 0.625 mm were 1.83, 3.28, 4.40, 4.53, and 5.27 for FBP, IPV STD, IPV-LCD STD, IPV STR, and IPV-LCD STR, respectively. The normalized NPS for the IPV-LCD STD and STR images were slightly shifted to the higher frequency compared with that for the FBP image. Conclusion: IPV-LCD images further improve the low-contrast detectability compared with FBP and conventional IPV images while maintaining similar FBP image appearances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.