Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747387›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Fast and accurate matching of cellular barcodes across short-reads and long-reads of single-cell RNA-seq experiments.

Ghazal Ebrahimi, Baraa Orabi, Meghan Robinson, Cedric Chauve, Ryan Flannigan, Faraz Hach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advances in single-cell long-read sequencing technologies.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Glioma Stem Cells: Novel Data Obtained by Single-Cell Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ghazal EbrahimiBioinformatics Program, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Baraa OrabiComputer Science Department, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Meghan RobinsonVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cedric ChauveDepartment of Mathematics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Ryan FlanniganVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Faraz HachComputer Science Department, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing allows for characterizing the gene expression landscape at the cell type level. However, because of its use of short-reads, it is severely limited at detecting full-length features of transcripts such as alternative splicing. New library preparation techniques attempt to extend single-cell sequencing by utilizing both long-reads and short-reads. These techniques split the library material, after it is tagged with cellular barcodes, into two pools: one for short-read sequencing and one for long-read sequencing. However, the challenge of utilizing these techniques is that they require matching the cellular barcodes sequenced by the erroneous long-reads to the cellular barcodes detected by the short-reads. To overcome this challenge, we introduce scTagger, a computational method to match cellular barcodes data from long-reads and short-reads. We tested scTagger against another state-of-the-art tool on both real and simulated datasets, and we demonstrate that scTagger has both significantly better accuracy and time efficiency.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsGenomicsSequence analysis

Identifiers

PMID35747387
PMCPMC9209721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.