Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747314›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2022

New agents for DOAC reversal: a practical management review.

Katie White, Uzma Faruqi, Alexander Ander T Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of patients with proximal femur fractures under DOACs.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Hibernation and hemostasis.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie WhiteHaematology Clinical Fellow Department of Haematological Medicine, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH.
Uzma FaruqiHaematology Specialist Registrar Department of Haematological Medicine, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH.
Alexander Ander T CohenConsultant Physician and Epidemiologist Department of Haematological Medicine, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bleeding is the commonest and most concerning adverse event associated with anticoagulants. Bleeding, depending on the severity, is managed in various ways, and for severe or life-threatening bleeding, specific antidotes are indicated and recommended. This review provides guidance relating to specific direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) reversal agents, the antidotes. We discuss their indications for use, dosing, and potential side effects.

Indexed as

anticoagulationbleeding riskdirect oral anticoagulant (DOAC)DOAC antidotesDOAC reversal

Identifiers

PMID35747314
PMCPMC9196076
OpenAlexW4206063567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.