Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747253›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Emerging Trends in Botulinum Neurotoxin A Resistance: An International Multidisciplinary Review and Consensus.

Wilson W S Ho, Philipp Albrecht, Pacifico E Calderon, Niamh Corduff, David Loh, Michael U Martin, Je-Young Park, Lis S Suseno, Fang-Wen Tseng, Vasanop Vachiramon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Aesthetic doctors' perception and attitudes toward tolerance in botulinum toxin.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Wilson W S HoThe Specialists: Lasers, Aesthetics and Plastic Surgery, Central, Hong Kong.
Philipp AlbrechtDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Pacifico E CalderonDepartment of Professionalism, Medical Ethics and Humanities, College of Medicine, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, the Philippines.
Niamh CorduffCosmetic Refinement Clinic Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
David LohDavid Loh Surgery, Singapore.
Michael U MartinRetired, Springe, Germany.
Je-Young ParkApkoo-Jung Oracle Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
Lis S SusenoDivision of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Fang-Wen TsengTaoyuan Milano Aesthetic Clinic, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Vasanop VachiramonDivision of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rungsima WanitphakdeedechaDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chong-Hyun WonDepartment of Dermatology, Ulsan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jonathan N T YuJY Dermatology and Aesthetic Center, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Mary DingleyThe Cosmetic Medicine Centre, Toowong, Queensland, Australia.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DESt. Luke's Medical Center · PHMahidol University · THRumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo · IDSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection is the most widely performed aesthetic procedure and a first-line therapeutic option for various medical conditions. The potential for BoNT-A immunoresistance and secondary nonresponse related to neutralizing antibody (NAb) formation warrants attention as the range of BoNT-A aesthetic applications continues to expand. Methods: An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed published evidence on BoNT-A immunoresistance in aesthetic and therapeutic applications and discussed best practices integrating clinical, ethical, and aesthetic considerations. Consensus statements relating to awareness, assessment, and management of the risk of NAb-related secondary nonresponse in aesthetic practice were developed. Results: There was a consensus that, as doses used in aesthetic practice become like those in therapeutics, rates of NAb formation may be expected to increase. However, the true extent of NAb formation in aesthetics is likely underestimated due to limitations of published evidence and variability in treatment patterns of aesthetic patients. Since BoNT-A therapy is often lifelong, practitioners need to recognize immunogenicity as a potential complication that might affect future therapeutic use and strive to minimize modifiable risk factors. The selection and use of a BoNT-A product with the least immunogenic potential from the beginning may thus be advantageous, especially when treatment with high doses is planned. Conclusions: In view of current trends in BoNT-A aesthetic use, it is essential for practitioners to conduct thorough clinical assessments, inform patients of treatment risks, and develop BoNT-A treatment plans to minimize immunogenicity. This can help preserve the option of continued or future BoNT-A treatment with satisfactory outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID35747253
PMCPMC9208887
OpenAlexW4283399012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.