ArticleJournal of inflammation research2022
Prognostic Roles of Inflammation- and Nutrition-Based Indicators for Female Patients with Cancer.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between albumin-related inflammatory biomarkers and breast cancer risk: A secondary analysis of NHANES 1998-2018.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Long-Term Nutritional Benefits of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy Over Open Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Novel inflammatory-nutritional prognostic index for advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy and prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Association of aggregate index of systemic inflammation with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in female cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Inflammation-Nutrition Composite Indices and Ovarian Endometrioma: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Prognostic importance of modified geriatric nutritional risk index in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association of hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet score with risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among cancer survivors: NHANES 1999-2018.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Cholesterol-modified prognostic nutritional index (CPNI) as an effective tool for assessing the nutrition status and predicting survival in patients with breast cancer.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score and Inflammatory Burden Index for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients After Hepatectomy.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The incidence, progression, and prognosis of cancer could be affected by inflammation and nutrition. Female patients have different inflammatory and nutritional states depending on their age and tumor types. It is important to screen for suitable prognostic indicators in female patients with cancer of different ages and tumor types. Patients and Methods: Baseline clinicopathologic and laboratory characteristics of 1502 female patients with cancer were obtained from a multicenter cohort study. Concordance indices (C-indices) were used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of following inflammation- and nutrition-based indicators: advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), modified geriatric nutritional risk index (mGNRI), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), controlling nutritional status score (CONUT), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein score (LCS). Results: The most suitable indicators in different female populations with cancer had C-indices as follows: LCR (0.668; 95% CI, 0.644-0.693) for all females; AGR (0.681; 95% CI, 0.619-0.743) for young females; LCR (0.667; 95% CI, 0.628-0.706) for middle-aged females; ALI (0.597; 95% CI, 0.574-0.620) for elderly females; LCR (0.684; 95% CI, 0.621-0.747) for females with reproductive system cancer; and ALI (0.652; 95% CI, 0.624-0.680) for females with non-reproductive system cancer. Conclusion: The most suitable indicators for the different female populations with cancer are summarized as follows: LCR for all females, AGR for young females, LCR for middle-aged females, ALI for elderly females, LCR for females with reproductive system cancer, and ALI for females with non-reproductive system cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.