ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2022
Post-cesarean severe sepsis and uterine wound disruption presenting as abdominal wound abscess and peritonitis: A case report.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wounds to Wisdom: Exploring Risk Factors and Outcomes for Surgically Managed Postcesarean Wound Infections.AJP reports · 2026Article
- Successful Management of Infected Widely Dehisced Wound Using Progressive Tension Sutures: Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Postpartum Endometritis and Sepsis Associated withReports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Maternal sepsis due to Bacteroides fragilis: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Review
- Severe Complications of Uterine Dehiscence Post-Lower Segment Cesarean Section: A Case Report Emphasizing the Importance of Timely Diagnosis and Intervention.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Management of post-cesarean pelvic abscess in the uterine scar: A case report and mini-review of the literature.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing rate of cesarean section in Bhutan, the complications are expected to rise. Uterine scar dehiscence is one of the immediate complications of cesarean section, which has high morbidity and mortality. Herein, we report a case of uterine wound dehiscence with pelvic abscess following cesarean section, who presented with paralytic ileus and surgical site infection. There should be high degree of suspicion of uterine scar dehiscence with pelvic abscess in cases of paralytic ileus and surgical site infection following cesarean section, which does not improve with medical management. What made this case unusual was presentation of uterine scar dehiscence with abdominal wound sepsis. Prompt diagnosis with appropriate treatment is required to prevent morbidity and possible maternal mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.