Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747186›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness.

Debi Boeras, Cheikh Tidiane Diagne, Jose L Pelegrino, Marc Grandadam, Veasna Duong, Philippe Dussart, Paul Brey, Didye Ruiz, Marisa Adati, Annelies Wilder-Smith and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Chikungunya fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Debi BoerasGlobal Health Impact Group, Atlanta, USA.
Cheikh Tidiane DiagneInstitut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Jose L PelegrinoInstituto Pedro Kouri, Havana, Cuba.
Marc GrandadamInstitute Pasteur du Laos, Vientiane Laos.
Veasna DuongInstitute Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Philippe DussartInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Paul BreyInstitute Pasteur du Laos, Vientiane Laos.
Didye RuizInstituto Pedro Kouri, Havana, Cuba.
Marisa AdatiNational Institute for Quality Control in Health, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Annelies Wilder-SmithUmea University, Umea, Sweden.
Andrew K FalconarUniversidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Claudia M RomeroUniversidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Maria GuzmanInstituto Pedro Kouri, Havana, Cuba.
Nagwa HasaninSupply Division, UNICEF, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amadou SallInstitut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Rosanna W PeelingClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí” · CUInstitut Pasteur de Dakar · SNUniversidad del Norte · COUniversity of London · GBInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar · MGInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Development and evaluation of diagnostics for diseases of epidemic potential are often funded during epidemics, but not afterwards, leaving countries unprepared for the next epidemic. United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) partnered with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to address this important gap by investing in an advance purchase commitment (APC) mechanism to accelerate the development and evaluation of Zika rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for case detection and surveillance. This paper describes the performance evaluation of five Zika RDTs eligible for procurement. Methods: A network of European Union-funded ZikaPLAN sites in Africa, Asia, Latin America with access to relevant serum specimens were selected to evaluate RDTs developed for the UNICEF APC mechanism. A standardised protocol and evaluation panels were developed and a call for specimens for the evaluation panels issued to different sites. Each site contributed specimens to the evaluation from their biobank. Data were collated, analysed and presented to the UNICEF Procurement Review Group for review. Findings: Three RDTs met the criteria for UNICEF procurement of sensitivity and specificity of 85% against a refence standard. The sensitivity/specificity of the ChemBio anti-Zika Virus (ZIKV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) test was 86.4 %/86.7% and the ChemBio ZCD system for anti-ZIKV IgM was 79.0%/97.1%, anti-dengue virus (DENV) IgM 90.0%/89.2%, anti-Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) IgM 90.6%/97.2%. The sensitivity/specificity of the SD Biosensor anti-ZIKV IgM was 96.8 %/90.8%, anti-DENV IgM 71.8%/83.5%, the DENV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) glycoprotein 90.0%/90.2%, anti- yellow fever virus (YFV) IgM 84.6%/92.4%, anti-CHIKV IgM 86.3%/97.5%. Interpretation: Three RDTs fulfilled the performance thresholds set by WHO and were eligible for UNICEF procurement. These tests will improve the diagnosis of ZIKV and other arboviral infections as well as providing countries with better tools for surveillance and response to future epidemics. Funding: This work was supported by the USAID grant GHA-G-00-07-00007 and ZikaPLAN (European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 734584).

Indexed as

Advance purchase commitmentBiobanking networkClinical medicineDiagnosticsEpidemic preparednessEvaluationZika

Identifiers

PMID35747186
PMCPMC9167860
OpenAlexW4281632835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.