Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747180›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Gender gap in annual preventive care services in France.

Bamba Gaye, Hélène Hergault, Camille Lassale, Magalie Ladouceur, Eugenie Valentin, Maxime Vignac, Nicolas Danchin, Mor Diaw, Marina Kvaskoff, Sarah Chamieh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bamba GayeINSERM, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Hélène HergaultAP-HP, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Cardiology Department, Paris, France.
Camille LassaleHospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Magalie LadouceurINSERM, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Eugenie ValentinINSERM, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Maxime VignacINSERM, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Nicolas DanchinAP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Cardiology Department, Paris, France.
Mor DiawLaboratoire de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, FMPO - UCAD, Dakar, Sénégal.
Marina KvaskoffCESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Sarah ChamiehINSERM, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Frederique ThomasAP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Cardiology Department, Paris, France.
Erin D MichosJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Xavier JouvenINSERM, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In France, screening for cardiovascular risk factors is recommended during annual preventive visits. However, data are lacking on the temporal trend in women's uptake to preventive care services, and in cardiovascular and mortality outcomes Method: Ee conducted repeated cross-sectional studies including a total of 366,270 individuals who had a first examination at the Centre d'Investigations Préventives et Cliniques, France, between January 1992 and December 2011. Findings: Women's participation was low below 50 years of age, then increases from 50 to 70 years, and is lower for women older than 70 years. The gap in female participation was more pronounced among individuals with high education, low social deprivation, and no depressive symptoms. Compared with the general population, the screened population had significantly lower standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) among both men and women, for all age ranges. Screened women aged 18-49 years showed a lower mortality gain compared with men of the same age; SMRs did not differ significantly by sex for individuals over 50 years. Interpretation: In this community-based sample, compared with men, women's participation to annual preventive care services was lower, and screened women had a lower mortality gain. Despite the demonstrated benefit of annual check-ups on health, there is a gender gap in adherence to preventive programs and in efficiency of screening programs, especially in the young age range. This gap in cardiovascular disease prevention may result in poorer cardiovascular health in women. Urgent adaptations to overcome this gender gap in preventive screening in France are warranted. Funding: Bamba Gaye is supported by the Fondation Recherche Médicale grant.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular screeningGender gapMortalityPreventive medicineWomen

Identifiers

PMID35747180
PMCPMC9156877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.