Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35747123›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2022

Simultaneous Gemcitabine and Percutaneous CT-Guided Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Yangyang Ma, Yanli Xing, Hongmei Li, Bing Liang, Rongrong Li, Jianyu Li, Zhonghai Li, Mao Lin, Lizhi Niu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yangyang MaCentral Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0092-963X
Yanli XingDepartment of Oncology, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.
Hongmei LiDepartment of Oncology, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.
Bing LiangDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesia, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.
Rongrong LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.
Jianyu LiDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesia, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.
Zhonghai LiDepartment of Radiology, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.
Mao LinCentral Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-8963
Lizhi NiuDepartment of Oncology, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510665, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-0978
Fuda Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new local ablation technique for pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to analyse the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous gemcitabine and percutaneous CT-guided IRE for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Materials and Methods: From October 2016 to January 2018, 61 patients with LAPC who received simultaneous gemcitabine and IRE therapy (GEM-IRE group, Results: Technical success rates were 90.0% (27/30) and 93.3% (28/30) in the GEM-IRE and IRE groups. Compared with the IRE group, the GEM-IRE group exhibited longer overall survival (OS), local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS), and distant disease free survival (DDFS) from IRE (OS, 17.1 Conclusions: Simultaneous gemcitabine and percutaneous CT-guided IRE therapy model was effective and well-tolerated therapeutic strategy in LAPC patients.

Identifiers

PMID35747123
PMCPMC9213186
OpenAlexW4282939068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.