Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746959›Full record

ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2022

Bidirectional Effect of Repeated Exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field (50 Hz) of 1 and 7 mT on Oxidative/Antioxidative Status in Rat's Brain: The Prediction for the Vulnerability to Diseases.

Angelika Klimek, Anna Nowakowska, Hanna Kletkiewicz, Joanna Wyszkowska, Justyna Maliszewska, Milena Jankowska, Lukasz Peplowski, Justyna Rogalska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Open Questions on the Electromagnetic Field Contribution to the Risk of Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angelika KlimekDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-9802
Anna NowakowskaDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-1522
Hanna KletkiewiczDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-6489
Joanna WyszkowskaDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-5160
Justyna MaliszewskaDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-3123
Milena JankowskaDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-5064
Lukasz PeplowskiDepartment of Biophysics, Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-7937
Justyna RogalskaDepartment of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7819-7814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies reported evidence for opposite effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (EMF): harmful, including the oxidative stress induction, and beneficial, such as the activation of antioxidant defense. People's exposure to EMF is often repeated or prolonged, and it is important to consider the cumulative effect of such kind of exposure on the organism. If changes evoked by repeated exposure to EMF are permanent, responsiveness to other stress factors can be modified. The aims of our study were (1) to evaluate changes in the levels of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense markers in the prefrontal cortex of adult rats after repeated exposure to 1 and 7 mT EMF and (2) to assess whether repeated EMF exposure can modify oxidative/antioxidative status in response to other stress factors. Rats were exposed to EMF 1 h/day for 7 days, one, twice, or three times. After each exposure, 8-isoprostanes, protein carbonyl groups, and the total antioxidant capacity were assessed. Part of the animals, after EMF treatment, was exposed to another stress factor-open field. Results showed that repeated exposure changed the oxidative/antioxidative status depending on the intensity of the EMF and the number of exposures. 1 mT EMF created weak changes in the oxidative status in the brain; however, 7 mT EMF moved the balance to a clearly higher level. The changes in the oxidative status after 1 mT EMF were enough to reduce, and after 7 mT EMF to intensify oxidative processes in response to the next stress. We concluded that the organism might adapt to "weak" EMF, while "strong" EMF exceeds the adaptive capacity of the organism and sensitizes it to subsequent stress, and thus may modulate vulnerability to diseases. Our results also provide new insights into the possible therapeutic properties of the magnetic field, as 1 mT EMF appears to have a potentially protective impact on the brain.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsElectromagnetic FieldsAnimalsBrainHumansOxidation-ReductionOxidative StressRatsAntioxidants

Identifiers

PMID35746959
PMCPMC9213150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.