Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746856›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of health psychology2022

A systematic review evaluating metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety and somatic distress.

Edwina Keen, Maria Kangas, Philippe T Gilchrist

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of health psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edwina KeenSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7412-4650
Maria KangasSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8693-2949
Philippe T GilchristSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5036-3369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreasing evidence suggests metacognitive beliefs may underpin transdiagnostic mechanisms maintaining psychopathology. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate published studies investigating the role of metacognitive beliefs in somatic distress in adult samples.

methodA systematic review was conducted, spanning five data bases. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were qualitatively synthesized.

resultsThirty-six studies (N = 12,390) met inclusion criteria with results suggesting a relatively consistent positive relationship between metacognitive beliefs and somatic distress. Both general and syndrome-specific metacognitive beliefs demonstrated relationships with not only emotional distress, but also physical symptoms themselves.

conclusionsResults are discussed in terms of conceptualizing somatic distress through the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) Model. Future research into metacognitive therapy for somatic populations is recommended.

Indexed as

AnxietyMetacognitionAdultAnxiety DisordersEmotionsExecutive FunctionHumanshealthmetacognitionmetacognitive beliefphysical symptomsomatic

Identifiers

PMID35746856
PMCPMC9796692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.