Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746800›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Identification of Phage Receptor-Binding Protein Sequences with Hidden Markov Models and an Extreme Gradient Boosting Classifier.

Dimitri Boeckaerts, Michiel Stock, Bernard De Baets, Yves Briers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Isolation and characterization of broad-rangeMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-based taxonomic classification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitri BoeckaertsLaboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-2840
Michiel StockResearch Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-6061
Bernard De BaetsResearch Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3876-620X
Yves BriersLaboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7723-1040
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor-binding proteins (RBPs) of bacteriophages initiate the infection of their corresponding bacterial host and act as the primary determinant for host specificity. The ever-increasing amount of sequence data enables the development of predictive models for the automated identification of RBP sequences. However, the development of such models is challenged by the inconsistent or missing annotation of many phage proteins. Recently developed tools have started to bridge this gap but are not specifically focused on RBP sequences, for which many different annotations are available. We have developed two parallel approaches to alleviate the complex identification of RBP sequences in phage genomic data. The first combines known RBP-related hidden Markov models (HMMs) from the Pfam database with custom-built HMMs to identify phage RBPs based on protein domains. The second approach consists of training an extreme gradient boosting classifier that can accurately discriminate between RBPs and other phage proteins. We explained how these complementary approaches can reinforce each other in identifying RBP sequences. In addition, we benchmarked our methods against the recently developed PhANNs tool. Our best performing model reached a precision-recall area-under-the-curve of 93.8% and outperformed PhANNs on an independent test set, reaching an F1-score of 84.0% compared to 69.8%.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage ReceptorsBacteriophagesCarrier ProteinsProtein BindingProteinsBacteriophage ReceptorsCarrier ProteinsProteinsextreme gradient boostinghidden Markov modelsmachine learningphagereceptor-binding protein

Identifiers

PMID35746800
PMCPMC9230537
OpenAlexW4283161205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.