Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746652›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Companion Animals: Prospective Serological Survey and Risk Factor Analysis in France.

Pierre Bessière, Timothée Vergne, Matéo Battini, Jessie Brun, Julien Averso, Etienne Joly, Jean-Luc Guérin, Marie-Christine Cadiergues

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre BessièreIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-0027
Timothée VergneIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Matéo BattiniIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Jessie BrunSmall Animal Clinic, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Julien AversoSmall Animal Clinic, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Etienne JolyInstitute of Pharmacology and Structural Biology (IPBS), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, 31400 Toulouse, France.
Jean-Luc GuérinIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Marie-Christine CadierguesSmall Animal Clinic, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6909-0153
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for COVID-19 in people, has been detected in companion animals on rare occasions. A limited number of large-scale studies have investigated the exposure of companion animals to SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this prospective study was to estimate seroprevalence in privately owned dogs and cats presented in veterinary clinics in different French regions and to test the hypothesis that the occurrence of an episode of COVID-19 in the household and close contact with the owner would increase the chances of the animals being seropositive. One hundred and sixty-five dogs and 143 cats were blood-sampled between March 2020 and December 2021. Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 8.4% of cats (12/143) and 5.4% of dogs (9/165). Seven animals (three dogs and four cats) were seropositive in the absence of an episode of COVID-19 in the household. Despite not being statistically significant (chi-square test,

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesCOVID-19Dog DiseasesAnimalsCatsDogsFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic Studiescatdogepidemiologyrisk factorsSARS-CoV-2serologysurvey

Identifiers

PMID35746652
PMCPMC9229200
OpenAlexW4283465478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.