Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746539›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Anti-Vaccine Attitudes among Adults in the U.S. during the COVID-19 Pandemic after Vaccine Rollout.

Jasmin Choi, Sarah A Lieff, Gabriella Y Meltzer, Margaux M Grivel, Virginia W Chang, Lawrence H Yang, Don C Des Jarlais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasmin ChoiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1902-6927
Sarah A LieffDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Gabriella Y MeltzerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-9730
Margaux M GrivelDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Virginia W ChangDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-6989
Lawrence H YangDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Don C Des JarlaisDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0157-8168

Funding

New York University School of Global Public Health Anti-racism, Social Justice, & Public Health Grants N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though vaccination is the most effective measure against COVID-19 infections, vaccine rollout efforts have been hampered by growing anti-vaccine attitudes. Based on current knowledge, we identified three domains (beliefs, discrimination, and news) as our correlates of primary interest to examine the association with anti-vaccine attitudes. This is one of the first studies to examine key correlates of anti-vaccine attitudes during the critical early stages of vaccine implementation in the United States. An online survey was administered in May 2021 to a non-representative, nationally based sample of adults (N = 789). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found that individuals who expressed worry about COVID-19 (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.21, 0.55) and had greater knowledge of COVID-19 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.25, 0.99) were less likely to hold anti-vaccine attitudes. Conversely, individuals who held stigmatizing views of COVID-19 (OR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.53, 3.99), had experienced racial discrimination (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.25, 3.67) and discrimination related to COVID-19 (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.54, 5.24), and who had been watching Fox News (OR = 3.95, 95% CI 2.61, 5.97) were more likely to hold anti-vaccine attitudes. These findings suggest COVID-19 beliefs, experiences of discrimination, and news sources should be considered when designing targeted approaches to address the anti-vaccine movement.

Indexed as

anti-vaccineCOVID-19United Statesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35746539
PMCPMC9228411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.