Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746297›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Community- and Data-Driven Services for Multi-Policy Pedestrian Routing.

Ioan Damian, Anca Daniela Ionita, Silvia Oana Anton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ioan DamianAutomation and Industrial Informatics Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Anca Daniela IonitaAutomation and Industrial Informatics Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8966-6196
Silvia Oana AntonAutomation and Industrial Informatics Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedestrian routing is important in a multitude of public spaces, especially those characterized by a large number of newcomers. Their needs may be diverse, with priority for the shortest path, the less crowded or the less polluted one, the accessibility for reduced mobility, or the sheltering from unfavorable weather conditions. Hence, typical graph-based routing must be enriched to support multiple policies, at the choice of each person. The paper proposes a systemic approach and a set of services for orientation and accessibility, which are both community-driven and data-driven, for correctly perceiving the routing necessities and the surrounding situation. The response time to a pathfinding query depends on the types of policies applied and not only on their number, because each of them contributes to the customization of the weighted graph, although it refers to the same physical space traversed by pedestrians. The paper also presents results of loading tests for up to 5000 Virtual Users, inspired from real-life requirements and executed on a graph that models a real building in our university; different policies are applied to assess performance metrics, with simulated community feedback and sensor data.

Indexed as

PedestriansHumansPolicyWeatherperformance testingroute directionssmart citiessoftware services

Identifiers

PMID35746297
PMCPMC9227617
OpenAlexW4283027691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.