Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746256›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Novel Deep Learning-Based Cooperative Communication Channel Model for Wireless Underground Sensor Networks.

Kanthavel Radhakrishnan, Dhaya Ramakrishnan, Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf, Mueen Uddin, Chin-Ling Chen, Chih-Ming Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kanthavel RadhakrishnanDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Dhaya RamakrishnanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Arts and Science-Sarat Abidha, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-7272
Osamah Ibrahim KhalafNano Renewable Energy Research Center, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad 10072, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-8384
Mueen UddinCollege of Computing and IT, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha 24449, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-3407
Chin-Ling ChenSchool of Information Engineering, Changchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun 130600, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-2043
Chih-Ming WuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China.

Funding

the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan No. MOST 110-2218-E-305-MBK and MOST 110-2410-H-324 -004 -MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless Underground Sensor Networks (WUSNs) have been showing prospective supervising application domains in the underground region of the earth through sensing, computation, and communication. This paper presents a novel Deep Learning (DL)-based Cooperative communication channel model for Wireless Underground Sensor Networks for accurate and reliable monitoring in hostile underground locations. Furthermore, the proposed communication model aims at the effective utilization of cluster-based Cooperative models through the relay nodes. However, by keeping the cost effectiveness, reliability, and user-friendliness of wireless underground sensor networks through inter-cluster Cooperative transmission between two cluster heads, the determination of the overall energy performance is also measured. The energy co-operative channel allocation routing (ECCAR), Energy Hierarchical Optimistic Routing (EHOR), Non-Cooperative, and Dynamic Energy Routing (DER) methods were used to figure out how well the proposed WUSN works. The Quality of Service (QoS) parameters such as transmission time, throughput, packet loss, and efficiency were used in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed WUSNs. From the simulation results, it is apparently seen that the proposed system demonstrates some superiority over other methods in terms of its better energy utilization of 89.71%, Packet Delivery ratio of 78.2%, Average Packet Delay of 82.3%, Average Network overhead of 77.4%, data packet throughput of 83.5% and an average system packet loss of 91%.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksDeep LearningAlgorithmsCommunicationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsWireless Technologydeep learning based cooperative communication channelmulti-input-single-outputwireless underground sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID35746256
PMCPMC9228907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.