Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746222›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Recent Advances in Bipedal Walking Robots: Review of Gait, Drive, Sensors and Control Systems.

Tadeusz Mikolajczyk, Emilia Mikołajewska, Hayder F N Al-Shuka, Tomasz Malinowski, Adam Kłodowski, Danil Yurievich Pimenov, Tomasz Paczkowski, Fuwen Hu, Khaled Giasin, Dariusz Mikołajewski and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tadeusz MikolajczykDepartment of Production Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5253-590X
Emilia MikołajewskaDepartment of Physiotherapy, LudwikRydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-3068
Hayder F N Al-ShukaDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Baghdad University, Baghdad 10001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-385X
Tomasz MalinowskiDepartment of Production Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Adam KłodowskiLaboratory of machine Design, Lappeenranta University of Technology, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4965-5521
Danil Yurievich PimenovDepartment of Automated Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, Lenin Prosp. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-8928
Tomasz PaczkowskiDepartment of Production Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-8817
Fuwen HuSchool of Mechanical and Material Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3508-8930
Khaled GiasinSchool of Mechanical and Design Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-8602
Dariusz MikołajewskiInstitute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4157-2796
Marek MackoFaculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8743-6602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is an intensive development of bipedal walking robots. The most known solutions are based on the use of the principles of human gait created in nature during evolution. Modernbipedal robots are also based on the locomotion manners of birds. This review presents the current state of the art of bipedal walking robots based on natural bipedal movements (human and bird) as well as on innovative synthetic solutions. Firstly, an overview of the scientific analysis of human gait is provided as a basis for the design of bipedal robots. The full human gait cycle that consists of two main phases is analysed and the attention is paid to the problem of balance and stability, especially in the single support phase when the bipedal movement is unstable. The influences of passive or active gait on energy demand are also discussed. Most studies are explored based on the zero moment. Furthermore, a review of the knowledge on the specific locomotor characteristics of birds, whose kinematics are derived from dinosaurs and provide them with both walking and running abilities, is presented. Secondly, many types of bipedal robot solutions are reviewed, which include nature-inspired robots (human-like and birdlike robots) and innovative robots using new heuristic, synthetic ideas for locomotion. Totally 45 robotic solutions are gathered by thebibliographic search method. Atlas was mentioned as one of the most perfect human-like robots, while the birdlike robot cases were Cassie and Digit. Innovative robots are presented, such asslider robot without knees, robots with rotating feet (3 and 4 degrees of freedom), and the hybrid robot Leo, which can walk on surfaces and fly. In particular, the paper describes in detail the robots' propulsion systems (electric, hydraulic), the structure of the lower limb (serial, parallel, mixed mechanisms), the types and structures of control and sensor systems, and the energy efficiency of the robots. Terrain roughness recognition systems using different sensor systems based on light detection and ranging or multiple cameras are introduced. A comparison of performance, control and sensor systems, drive systems, and achievements of known human-like and birdlike robots is provided. Thirdly, for the first time, the review comments on the future of bipedal robots in relation to the concepts of conventional (natural bipedal) and synthetic unconventional gait. We critically assess and compare prospective directions for further research that involve the development of navigation systems, artificial intelligence, collaboration with humans, areas for the development of bipedal robot applications in everyday life, therapy, and industry.

Indexed as

RoboticsArtificial IntelligenceBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitLocomotionProspective StudiesWalkingbipedal locomotionbird gaithuman gaithumanoidroboticssensorssynthetic-based biped gait

Identifiers

PMID35746222
PMCPMC9229068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.