Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746216›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Applying Different Strategies of Task Constraint Manipulation in Small-Sided and Conditioned Games: How Do They Impact Physical and Tactical Demands?

João Cláudio Machado, Alberto Góes, Rodrigo Aquino, Bruno L S Bedo, Ronélia Viana, Mateus Rossato, Alcides Scaglia, Sérgio J Ibáñez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

João Cláudio MachadoFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.
Alberto GóesFaculty of Physical Education, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-859, Brazil.
Rodrigo AquinoLabSport, Post-Graduate Program in Physical Education, Center of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória 29075-910, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-7316
Bruno L S BedoBiomechanics and Motor Control Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sports of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil.
Ronélia VianaFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.
Mateus RossatoFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4132-9860
Alcides ScagliaFaculty of Physical Education, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-859, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1462-1783
Sérgio J IbáñezOptimisation of Training and Sport Performance Research Group, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-4086

Funding

Aid for Research Groups (GR21149) from the Regional Government of Extremadura (Department of Economy, Science and Digital Agenda), with a contribution from the European Union from the European Funds for Regional Development. GR21149This research was funded by Secretaria Nacional de Futebol e Defesa dos Direitos do Torcedor (SNFDT), Secretaria Nacional de Esportes do Ministério da Cidadania TED Nº 01/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how different strategies of task constraint manipulation impact physical and tactical demands in small-sided and conditioned games (SSCG). Ten recreational U-17 soccer players participated in this study (16.89 ± 0.11 years). We used different strategies of task manipulation to design two 4 vs. 4 SSCG: Structural SSCG and Functional SSCG. In Structural SSCG, pitch format and goal sizes were manipulated, while in Functional SSCG, players were allowed to kick the ball twice and at least 5 passes to shoot at the opponent’s goal. Players participated in four Structural and Functional SSCG, of five minutes duration with a two-minute interval in between. Players’ physical performance and tactical behavior were assessed using the WIMU PROTM inertial device. Structural SSCG stimulated players to cover more distance in sprinting (p = 0.003) and high-speed running (p < 0.001). Regarding tactical behavior, Structural SSCG stimulated players to explore game space better (p < 0.001). Moreover, Functional SSCG stimulated players to be closer to the ball, decreasing the effective playing space (p = 0.008). We conclude that these strategies of task constraint manipulation impact physical and tactical demands of the game.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceRunningSoccerMotivationPhysical Functional Performancephysical demandsrulessoccertactical behaviortask design

Identifiers

PMID35746216
PMCPMC9227788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.