Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35746208›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16.

Iftikhar Naseer, Sheeraz Akram, Tehreem Masood, Arfan Jaffar, Muhammad Adnan Khan, Amir Mosavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iftikhar NaseerFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore 54600, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7927-671X
Sheeraz AkramFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore 54600, Pakistan.
Tehreem MasoodFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore 54600, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0103-9746
Arfan JaffarFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore 54600, Pakistan.
Muhammad Adnan KhanDepartment of Software, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-9935
Amir MosaviJohn von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-0613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantial attention as well as popularity. This study focuses on the intrinsic various CNN architectures: LeNet, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet-50, and Inception-V1, which have been scrutinized and compared with each other for the detection of lung cancer using publicly available LUNA16 datasets. Furthermore, multiple performance optimizers: root mean square propagation (RMSProp), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), were applied for this comparative study. The performances of the three CNN architectures were measured for accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, false omission rate, negative predictive value, and F1 score. The experimental results showed that the CNN AlexNet architecture with the SGD optimizer achieved the highest validation accuracy for CT lung cancer with an accuracy of 97.42%, misclassification rate of 2.58%, 97.58% sensitivity, 97.25% specificity, 97.58% positive predictive value, 97.25% negative predictive value, false omission rate of 2.75%, and F1 score of 97.58%. AlexNet with the SGD optimizer was the best and outperformed compared to the other state-of-the-art CNN architectures.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlexNetartificial intelligencebig datacancer researchdeep learningLeNetLUNA16lung cancermachine learningmedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID35746208
PMCPMC9227226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.