ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Non-Contact Activity Monitoring Using a Multi-Axial Inertial Measurement Unit in Animal Husbandry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vibration-Based Non-Contact Activity Classification for Home Cage Monitoring Using a Tuned-Beam IMU Sensing Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Using Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to Augment Cadaveric Temporal Training.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- A Vibration Sensing Device Using a Six-Axis IMU and an Optimized Beam Structure for Activity Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, a novel method is presented for non-contact non-invasive physical activity monitoring, which utilizes a multi-axial inertial measurement unit (IMU) to measure activity-induced structural vibrations in multiple axes. The method is demonstrated in monitoring the activity of a mouse in a husbandry cage, where activity is classified as resting, stationary activity and locomotion. In this setup, the IMU is mounted in the center of the underside of the cage floor where vibrations are measured as accelerations and angular rates in the X-, Y- and Z-axis. The ground truth of activity is provided by a camera mounted in the cage lid. This setup is used to record 27.67 h of IMU data and ground truth activity labels. A classification model is trained with 16.17 h of data which amounts to 3880 data points. Each data point contains eleven features, calculated from the X-, Y- and Z-axis accelerometer data. The method achieves over 90% accuracy in classifying activity versus non-activity. Activity is monitored continuously over more than a day and clearly depicts the nocturnal behavior of the inhabitant. The impact of this work is a powerful method to assess activity which enables automatic health evaluation and optimization of workflows for improved animal wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.