Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35745838›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Effectiveness and Nephrotoxicity of Loading Dose Colistin-Meropenem versus Loading Dose Colistin-Imipenem in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant

Wasan Katip, Peninnah Oberdorfer, Nongyao Kasatpibal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Carbapenem-resistantInfection & chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid Identification of Carbapenemase-ProducingInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Carbapenemase genes distribution in clonal lineages ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wasan KatipDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7665-8819
Peninnah OberdorferEpidemiology Research Group of Infectious Disease (ERGID), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Nongyao KasatpibalEpidemiology Research Group of Infectious Disease (ERGID), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is becoming more widely recognized as a serious cause of nosocomial infections, and colistin has been reintroduced in recent years for the treatment of CRAB infection. Combinations of colistin and meropenem or imipenem have been found to be effective against CRAB isolates, whereas clinical investigations have not definitively demonstrated the theoretical benefits of colistin combined therapy in patients with CRAB infections. The objective of this study was to compare the primary outcome (30-day survival rate) and secondary outcomes (clinical response, microbiological response and nephrotoxicity) between patients who received loading dose (LD) colistin−meropenem and LD colistin−imipenem for the treatment of CRAB infection. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed at Chiang Mai University Hospital in patients with CRAB infection who received LD colistin−meropenem or LD colistin−imipenem between 2011 and 2017, and 379 patients fulfilled the requirements for the inclusion criteria. The results of this study showed that patients who received LD colistin−imipenem had a lower 30-day survival rate (adjusted HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37−0.90; p = 0.015) and a lower clinical response (aHR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35−0.90; p = 0.017) compared with those who received LD colistin−meropenem. The microbiological response in patients with LD colistin−imipenem was 0.52 times (aHR) lower than that in those who received colistin−meropenem (95% CI: 0.34−0.81; p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.67−1.57; p = 0.897) between the two combination regimens. In conclusion, when comparing the combination of LD colistin with imipenem or meropenem, the combination of LD colistin and meropenem provides a better survival rate for treating CRAB. Thus, we suggest that combinations of LD colistin and meropenem should be considered when treating CRAB infections.

Indexed as

combination therapyCRAB infectionsimipenemloading dose colistinmeropenem

Identifiers

PMID35745838
PMCPMC9228626
OpenAlexW4282967047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.