Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35745808›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Microbubbles Stabilized by Protein Shell: From Pioneering Ultrasound Contrast Agents to Advanced Theranostic Systems.

Polina G Rudakovskaya, Roman A Barmin, Pavel S Kuzmin, Elena P Fedotkina, Alexander N Sencha, Dmitry A Gorin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Harnessing Ultrasonic Technologies to TreatMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Nanobubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: A Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Polina G RudakovskayaCenter for Photonic Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Nobel Str. 3, 121205 Moscow, Russia.
Roman A BarminCenter for Photonic Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Nobel Str. 3, 121205 Moscow, Russia.
Pavel S KuzminInstitute of Materials for Modern Energy and Nanotechnology, Dmitry Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, Miusskaya sq. 9, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Elena P FedotkinaResearch Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Akademika Oparina Str. 4, 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0682-3257
Alexander N SenchaResearch Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Akademika Oparina Str. 4, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry A GorinCenter for Photonic Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Nobel Str. 3, 121205 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 21-73-10254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is a widely-used imaging modality in clinics as a low-cost, non-invasive, non-radiative procedure allowing therapists faster decision-making. Microbubbles have been used as ultrasound contrast agents for decades, while recent attention has been attracted to consider them as stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems. Pioneering microbubbles were Albunex with a protein shell composed of human serum albumin, which entered clinical practice in 1993. However, current research expanded the set of proteins for a microbubble shell beyond albumin and applications of protein microbubbles beyond ultrasound imaging. Hence, this review summarizes all-known protein microbubbles over decades with a critical evaluation of formulations and applications to optimize the safety (low toxicity and high biocompatibility) as well as imaging efficiency. We provide a comprehensive overview of (1) proteins involved in microbubble formulation, (2) peculiarities of preparation of protein stabilized microbubbles with consideration of large-scale production, (3) key chemical factors of stabilization and functionalization of protein-shelled microbubbles, and (4) biomedical applications beyond ultrasound imaging (multimodal imaging, drug/gene delivery with attention to anticancer treatment, antibacterial activity, biosensing). Presented critical evaluation of the current state-of-the-art for protein microbubbles should focus the field on relevant strategies in microbubble formulation and application for short-term clinical translation. Thus, a protein bubble-based platform is very perspective for theranostic application in clinics.

Indexed as

albumincontrast agentsdrug deliverylysozymemicrobubblesoleosinproteinstheranosticsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35745808
PMCPMC9227336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.