ReviewPharmaceutics2022
Drug Delivery Systems in the Development of Novel Strategies for Glioblastoma Treatment.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoparticle-Based delivery of proteasome inhibitors for glioblastoma Therapy: Strategies to overcome Blood-Brain barrier and therapeutic resistance.Biochemical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Causal Associations of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Circulating Metabolites With Malignant Brain Neoplasms: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Surface-Modified Polymeric Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Therapy: A Review on Targeting Strategies and Delivery of Repurposed Drugs and Off-Label Non-Alkylating Agents.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Sonodynamic Therapy With Orally Absorbable Nanomedicine for Brain Tumor.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2025Review
- Electrospun PMVEMA Nanofibers Developed as a Fast-Release Platform for Antineoplastic Drugs Tested in Glioblastoma Primary Cultures.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Advanced nanotheranostic approaches for targeted glioblastoma treatment: a synergistic fusion of CRISPR-Cas gene editing, AI-driven tumor profiling, and BBB-modulation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Preparation of surface-modified PLGA nanoparticles containing carbon quantum dots: insights from C6 cell line assays.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Advances in PLGA-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Glioblastoma Treatment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology in brain cancer treatment: The role of gold nanoparticles as therapeutic enhancers.Ibrain · 2025Review
- Carbon-Encapsulated Iron Nanoparticles Seeking Integrins in Murine Glioma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- ABCG2 Expression as a Potential Survival Predictor in Human Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- CXCL12 impact on glioblastoma cells behaviors under dynamic culture conditions: Insights for developing new therapeutic approaches.PloS one · 2024Article
- Mechanical Properties of Glioblastoma: Perspectives for YAP/TAZ Signaling Pathway and Beyond.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Impact of simulated brain interstitial fluid flow on the chemokine CXCL12 release from an alginate-based hydrogel in a new 3DFrontiers in drug delivery · 2023Article
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Glioblastoma Multiforme: Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Nanomedicine for Glioblastoma Therapy: Novel Insights and Future Perspectives.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a grade IV glioma considered the most fatal cancer of the central nervous system (CNS), with less than a 5% survival rate after five years. The tumor heterogeneity, the high infiltrative behavior of its cells, and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that limits the access of therapeutic drugs to the brain are the main reasons hampering the current standard treatment efficiency. Following the tumor resection, the infiltrative remaining GBM cells, which are resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, can further invade the surrounding brain parenchyma. Consequently, the development of new strategies to treat parenchyma-infiltrating GBM cells, such as vaccines, nanotherapies, and tumor cells traps including drug delivery systems, is required. For example, the chemoattractant CXCL12, by binding to its CXCR4 receptor, activates signaling pathways that play a critical role in tumor progression and invasion, making it an interesting therapeutic target to properly control the direction of GBM cell migration for treatment proposes. Moreover, the interstitial fluid flow (IFF) is also implicated in increasing the GBM cell migration through the activation of the CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling pathway. However, due to its complex and variable nature, the influence of the IFF on the efficiency of drug delivery systems is not well understood yet. Therefore, this review discusses novel drug delivery strategies to overcome the GBM treatment limitations, focusing on chemokines such as CXCL12 as an innovative approach to reverse the migration of infiltrated GBM. Furthermore, recent developments regarding in vitro 3D culture systems aiming to mimic the dynamic peritumoral environment for the optimization of new drug delivery technologies are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.