ArticlePharmaceutics2022
The pH-Responsive Liposomes-The Effect of PEGylation on Release Kinetics and Cellular Uptake in Glioblastoma Cells.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- BBB-aware stimuli-responsive and biomimetic nanomedicines for glioblastoma.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in pH-Responsive Liposomes: Lessons Learnt and New Directions in Nanomedicine Development.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Innovations in Cancer Therapy: Endogenous Stimuli-Responsive Liposomes as Advanced Nanocarriers.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- PEGylated Nanoliposomes Encapsulated with Anticancer Drugs for Breast and Prostate Cancer Therapy: An Update.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Natural Food Components as Biocompatible Carriers: A Novel Approach to Glioblastoma Drug Delivery.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Targeted delivery of bee venom to A549 lung cancer cells by PEGylate liposomal formulation: an apoptotic investigation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhancing the efficacy of letrozole-loaded PEGylated nanoliposomes against breast cancer cells:Heliyon · 2024Article
- Targeted Glioblastoma Treatment via Synthesis and Functionalization of Gold Nanoparticles With De Novo-Engineered Transferrin-Like Peptides: Protocol for a Novel Method.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomedicine has been, to a certain degree, a success story in the development of superior anticancer therapies. However, there are tumors that remain a huge challenge for nanoformulations, for instance, brain tumors such as glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive brain tumor. To utilize the fact that such tumors are characterized by an acidic extracellular environment, we selected pH-responsive liposomes as a potential drug delivery system for superior delivery to GBM. Liposomes comprising PEGylated lipid of two chain lengths with encapsulated fluorescent marker calcein were characterized and challenged against non-PEGylated vesicles. The in vitro calcein release from three liposomal formulations (<200 nm), namely non-PEGylated (pH-Lip) and PEGylated, pH-Lip−PEG750, and pH-Lip−PEG2000, was followed at three pH conditions to prove the pH-responsiveness. The intracellular delivery of a liposomally encapsulated marker was determined in GL261 glioblastoma cell lines in vitro using both flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. The inclusion of PEG2000 within liposomal formulation resulted in reduced in vitro pH-responsiveness compared to pH-Lip and pH-Lip750. All three pH-responsive liposomal formulations improved intracellular uptake in GL261 cells compared to non-pH-responsive liposomes, with negligible differences regarding PEG length. The proposed formulations should be further evaluated in glioblastoma models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.