Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744963›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

How to Catch the Ball: Fullerene Binding to the Corannulene Pincer.

Filipe Menezes, Grzegorz Maria Popowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Buckycatcher in Solution-A Computational Perspective.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Filipe MenezesInstitute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7630-5447
Grzegorz Maria PopowiczInstitute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2818-7498

Funding

Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy KK 5197901TS0Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031L0268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corannulene pincer (also known in the literature as the buckycatcher) is a fascinating system that may encapsulate, among other molecules, the C60 and C70 fullerenes. These complexes are held together by strong π-stacking interactions. Although these are quantum mechanical effects, their description by quantum chemical methods has proved very hard. We used three semi-empirical methods, PM6-D3H4X, PM6-D3H+ and GFN2-xTB, to model the interactions. Binding to fullerenes was extended to all open conformations of the buckycatcher, and with the proper choice of solvation model and partition functions, we obtained Gibbs free energies of binding that deviated by 1.0-1.5 kcal/mol from the experimental data. Adding three-body dispersion to PM6-D3H+ led to even better agreement. These results agree better with the experimental data than calculations using higher-level methods at a significantly lower fraction of the computational cost. Furthermore, the formation of adducts with C60 was studied using dynamical simulations, which helped to build a more complete picture of the behavior of the corannulene pincer with fullerenes. We also investigated the use of exchange-binding models to recover more information on this system in solution. Though the final Gibbs free energies in solution were worsened, gas-phase enthalpies and entropies better mirrored the experimental data.

Indexed as

FullerenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsMolecular ConformationThermodynamicscorannuleneFullerenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsBorn–Oppenheimer molecular dynamicsbuckycatcher–fullerenesemi-empiricalthermodynamics of bindingπ stacking

Identifiers

PMID35744963
PMCPMC9228874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.