Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744817›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Investigation of the New Inhibitors by Sulfadiazine and Modified Derivatives of α-D-glucopyranoside for White Spot Syndrome Virus Disease of Shrimp by In Silico: Quantum Calculations, Molecular Docking, ADMET and Molecular Dynamics Study.

Ajoy Kumer, Unesco Chakma, Md Masud Rana, Akhel Chandro, Shopnil Akash, Mona M Elseehy, Sarah Albogami, Ahmed M El-Shehawi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the therapeutic potential ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ajoy KumerLaboratory of Computational Research for Drug Design and Material Science, Department of Chemistry, European University of Bangladesh, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-6166
Unesco ChakmaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, European University of Bangladesh, Gabtoli, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Md Masud RanaDepartment of Fishing and Post Harvest Technology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Akhel ChandroDepartment of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Shopnil AkashDepartment of Pharmacy, Daffodil International University, Sukrabad, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1751-705X
Mona M ElseehyDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Alexandria 21545, Egypt.
Sarah AlbogamiDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0774-5550
Ahmed M El-ShehawiDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-4904
Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University · BDTaif University · SAAlexandria University · EGBangladesh University of Engineering and Technology · BDDaffodil International University · BDEuropean University of Bangladesh · BD

Funding

Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia. TURSP - 2020/75
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The α-D-glucopyranoside and its derivatives were as the cardinal investigation for developing an effective medication to treat the highest deadly white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) diseases in Shrimp. In our forthcoming work, both computational tools, such as molecular docking, quantum calculations, pharmaceutical kinetics, ADMET, and their molecular dynamics, as well as the experimental trial against WSSV, were executed to develop novel inhibitors. In the beginning, molecular docking was carried out to determine inhibitors of the four targeted proteins of WSSV (PDB ID: 2ED6, 2GJ2, 2GJI, and 2EDM), and to determine the binding energies and interactions of ligands and proteins after docking. The range of binding affinity was found to be between -5.40 and -7.00 kcal/mol for the protein 2DEM, from -5.10 to 6.90 kcal/mol for the protein 2GJ2, from -4.70 to -6.2 kcal/mol against 2GJI, and from -5.5 kcal/mol to -6.6 kcal/mol for the evolved protein 2ED6 whereas the L01 and L03 display the highest binding energy in the protein 2EDM. After that, the top-ranked compounds (L01, L02, L03, L04, and L05), based on their high binding energies, were tested for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of 100 ns to verify the docking validation and stability of the docked complex by calculating the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and root mean square fluctuation (RMSF). The molecules with the highest binding energy were then picked and compared to the standard drugs that were been applied to fish experimentally to evaluate the treatment at various doses. Consequently, approximately 40-45% cure rate was obtained by applying the dose of oxytetracycline (OTC) 50% with vitamin C with the 10.0 g/kg feed for 10 days. These drugs (L09 to L12) have also been executed for molecular docking to compare with α-D-glucopyranoside and its derivatives (L01 to L08). Next, the evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters, such as drug-likeness and Lipinski's principles; absorption; distribution; metabolism; excretion; and toxicity (ADMET) factors, were employed gradually to further evaluate their suitability as inhibitors. It was discovered that all ligands (L01 to L12) were devoid of hepatotoxicity, and the AMES toxicity excluded L05. Additionally, all of the compounds convey a significant aqueous solubility and cannot permeate the blood-brain barrier. Moreover, quantum calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) provide the most solid evidence and testimony regarding their chemical stability, chemical reactivity, biological relevance, reactive nature and specific part of reactivity. The computational and virtual screenings for in silico study reveals that these chosen compounds (L01 to L08) have conducted the inhibitory effect to convey as a possible medication against the WSSV than existing drugs (L09, L10, L11 and L12) in the market. Next the drugs (L09, L10, L11 and L12) have been used in trials.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationWhite spot syndrome virus 1AnimalsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationSulfadiazineLigandsSulfadiazineADMETDFTdockingHOMOLUMOmolecular dynamicWSSV

Identifiers

PMID35744817
PMCPMC9228161
OpenAlexW4282833461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.