Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744694›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Changes of the Freshwater Microbial Community Structure and Assembly Processes during Different Sample Storage Conditions.

Yunfeng Wang, Xinghao Li, Yong Chi, Weibo Song, Qingyun Yan, Jie Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yunfeng WangInstitute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Xinghao LiKey Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei Engineering Research Center for Rural Drinking Water Security, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Yong ChiInstitute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Weibo SongInstitute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4189-6141
Qingyun YanEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-892X
Jie HuangDonghu Experimental Station of Lake Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1739-1856

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2018YFD0900701National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31801984, 32030015the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences No. 2019333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-standing dilemma for microbial analyses is how to handle and store samples, as it is widely assumed that the microbial diversity and community patterns would be affected by sample storage conditions. However, it is quite challenging to maintain consistency in field sampling, especially for water sample collection and storage. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of how sample storage conditions impact microbial community analyses and the magnitude of the potential storage effects, freshwater samples were collected and stored in bottles with lid closed and without lid at room temperature for up to 6 days. We revealed the dynamics of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbial communities under different storage conditions over time. The eukaryotic microbial communities changed at a faster rate than the prokaryotic microbial communities during storage. The alpha diversity of the eukaryotic microbial communities was not substantially influenced by container status or storage time for up to 12 h, but the beta diversity differed significantly between the control and all treatment samples. By contrast, no significant changes of either the alpha or beta diversity of the prokaryotic microbial communities were observed within 12 h of room-temperature storage, regardless of the container status. The potential interactions between microbial taxa were more complex when samples were stored in sealed bottles, and the deterministic processes played an increasingly important role in shaping the freshwater microbial communities with storage time. Our results suggest that water samples collected and stored without refrigeration for no more than 12 h may still be useful for downstream analyses of prokaryotic microbial communities. If the eukaryotic microbial communities are desired, storage of water samples should be limited to 3 h at room temperature.

Indexed as

community assemblyeukaryotic microbial communitiesfreshwaterprokaryotic microbial communitiesstorage conditions

Identifiers

PMID35744694
PMCPMC9229623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.