Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744537›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2022

Controllable Shrinking Fabrication of Solid-State Nanopores.

Xin Lei, Jiayan Zhang, Hao Hong, Zhishan Yuan, Zewen Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Solid-State Nanopores for Biomolecular Analysis and Detection.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin LeiSchool of Chemistry, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Jiayan ZhangSchool of Chemistry, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Hao HongSchool of Integrated Circuits, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Zhishan YuanSchool of Electro-Mechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zewen LiuSchool of Integrated Circuits, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2582-8042

Funding

Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chips 2019YFA0707002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopores have attracted widespread attention in DNA sequencing and protein or biomarker detection, owning to the single-molecule-scale detection accuracy. Despite the most use of naturally biological nanopores before, solid-state nanopores are widely developed with strong robustness, controllable sizes and geometries, a wide range of materials available, as well as flexible manufacturing. Therefore, various techniques typically based on focused ion beam or electron beam have been explored to drill nanopores directly on free-standing nanofilms. To further reduce and sculpt the pore size and shape for nano or sub-nano space-time sensing precision, various controllable shrinking technologies have been employed. Correspondingly, high-energy-beam-induced contraction with direct visual feedback represents the most widely used. The ability to change the pore diameter was attributed to surface tension induced original material migration into the nanopore center or new material deposition on the nanopore surface. This paper reviews typical solid-state nanopore shrinkage technologies, based on the careful summary of their principles and characteristics in particularly size and morphology changes. Furthermore, the advantages and disadvantages of different methods have also been compared completely. Finally, this review concludes with an optimistic outlook on the future of solid-state nanopores.

Indexed as

high energy beamshrinking fabricationsize and shape controlsolid-state nanopores

Identifiers

PMID35744537
PMCPMC9228871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.