ArticleMicromachines2022
Contributions of Red Blood Cell Sedimentation in a Driving Syringe to Blood Flow in Capillary Channels.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic Chip for Quantitatively Assessing Hemorheological Parameters.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Investigation of Red Cell Sedimentation Using Blood Shear Stress and Blood Flow Image in a Capillary Chip.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Assessment of Red Blood Cells in Pulsatile Blood Flows.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Red Blood Cell Sedimentation Index Using Shear Stress of Blood Flow in Microfluidic Channel.Biosensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), which has been commonly used to detect physiological and pathological diseases in clinical settings, has been quantified using an interface in a vertical tube. However, previous methods do not provide biophysical information on blood during the ESR test. Therefore, it is necessary to quantify the individual contributions in terms of viscosity and pressure. In this study, to quantify RBC sedimentation, the image intensity (Ib) and interface (β) were obtained by analyzing the blood flow in the microfluidic channels. Based on threshold image intensity, the corresponding interfaces of RBCs (Ib > 0.15) and diluent (Ib < 0.15) were employed to obtain the viscosities (µb, µ0) and junction pressures (Pb, P0). Two coefficients (CH1, CH2) obtained from the empirical formulas (µb = µ0 [1 + CH1], Pb = P0 [1 + CH2]) were calculated to quantify RBC sedimentation. The present method was then adopted to detect differences in RBC sedimentation for various suspended blood samples (healthy RBCs suspended in dextran solutions or plasma). Based on the experimental results, four parameters (µ0, P0, CH1, and CH2) are considered to be effective for quantifying the contributions of the hematocrit and diluent. Two coefficients exhibited more consistent trends than the conventional ESR method. In conclusion, the proposed method can effectively detect RBC sedimentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.