ArticleMicromachines2022
Characterization of Fluidic-Barrier-Based Particle Generation in Centrifugal Microfluidics.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-step generation of luminescent core-shell microspheres for cell encapsulation via pulsed operation in centrifugal microfluidics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Nanomaterials in PCR: exploring light-to-heat conversion mechanisms and microfluidic integration.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Review
- Low-cost optical sensors in electrified lab-on-a-disc platforms: liquid-phase boundary detection and automated diagnostics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Rational PCR Reactor Design in Microfluidics.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Investigating the Performance of the Multi-Lobed Leaf-Shaped Oscillatory Obstacles in Micromixers Using Bulk Acoustic Waves (BAW): Mixing and Chemical Reaction.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fluidic barrier in centrifugal microfluidic platforms is a newly introduced concept for making multiple emulsions and microparticles. In this study, we focused on particle generation application to better characterize this method. Because the phenomenon is too fast to be captured experimentally, we employ theoretical models to show how liquid polymeric droplets pass a fluidic barrier before crosslinking. We explain how secondary flows evolve and mix the fluids within the droplets. From an experimental point of view, the effect of different parameters, such as the barrier length, source channel width, and rotational speed, on the particles' size and aspect ratio are investigated. It is demonstrated that the barrier length does not affect the particle's ultimate velocity. Unlike conventional air gaps, the barrier length does not significantly affect the aspect ratio of the produced microparticles. Eventually, we broaden this concept to two source fluids and study the importance of source channel geometry, barrier length, and rotational speed in generating two-fluid droplets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.