Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744442›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2022

Cellular Aquaculture: Prospects and Challenges.

Mukunda Goswami, Yashwanth Belathur Shambhugowda, Arjunan Sathiyanarayanan, Nevil Pinto, Alexandrea Duscher, Reza Ovissipour, Wazir Singh Lakra, Ravishankar Chandragiri Nagarajarao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Myogenic Potential inACS omega · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mukunda GoswamiICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400061, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6863-7647
Yashwanth Belathur ShambhugowdaICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400061, India.
Arjunan SathiyanarayananICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400061, India.
Nevil PintoICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400061, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1611-6844
Alexandrea DuscherFuture Foods Lab and Cellular Agriculture Initiative, Department of Food Science and Technology, Seafood Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (VT), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-6232
Reza OvissipourFuture Foods Lab and Cellular Agriculture Initiative, Department of Food Science and Technology, Seafood Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (VT), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Wazir Singh LakraNABARD Chair Unit, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai Research Centre, Mumbai 400061, India.
Ravishankar Chandragiri NagarajaraoICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400061, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaculture plays an important role as one of the fastest-growing food-producing sectors in global food and nutritional security. Demand for animal protein in the form of fish has been increasing tremendously. Aquaculture faces many challenges to produce quality fish for the burgeoning world population. Cellular aquaculture can provide an alternative, climate-resilient food production system to produce quality fish. Potential applications of fish muscle cell lines in cellular aquaculture have raised the importance of developing and characterizing these cell lines. In vitro models, such as the mouse C2C12 cell line, have been extremely useful for expanding knowledge about molecular mechanisms of muscle growth and differentiation in mammals. Such studies are in an infancy stage in teleost due to the unavailability of equivalent permanent muscle cell lines, except a few fish muscle cell lines that have not yet been used for cellular aquaculture. The Prospect of cell-based aquaculture relies on the development of appropriate muscle cells, optimization of cell conditions, and mass production of cells in bioreactors. Hence, it is required to develop and characterize fish muscle cell lines along with their cryopreservation in cell line repositories and production of ideal mass cells in suitably designed bioreactors to overcome current cellular aquaculture challenges.

Indexed as

aquaculturecultivated seafoodfuture food

Identifiers

PMID35744442
PMCPMC9228929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.