Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744389›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Prediction of Strength and CBR Characteristics of Chemically Stabilized Coal Gangue: ANN and Random Forest Tree Approach.

Muhammad Nasir Amin, Mudassir Iqbal, Mohammed Ashfaq, Babatunde Abiodun Salami, Kaffayatullah Khan, Muhammad Iftikhar Faraz, Anas Abdulalim Alabdullah, Fazal E Jalal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Nasir AminDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6524-4389
Mudassir IqbalShanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4317-3978
Mohammed AshfaqDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal 506004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-8134
Babatunde Abiodun SalamiInterdisciplinary Research Center for Construction and Building Materials, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-2923
Kaffayatullah KhanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7994-4642
Muhammad Iftikhar FarazDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Anas Abdulalim AlabdullahDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0609-068X
Fazal E JalalShanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0019-4274

Funding

King Faisal University This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Project No. GRANT537]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coal mining waste in the form of coal gangue (CG) was established recently as a potential fill material in earthworks. To ascertain this potential, this study forecasts the strength and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) characteristics of chemically stabilized CG by deploying two widely used artificial intelligence approaches, i.e., artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF) regression. In this research work, varied dosage levels of lime (2, 4, and 6%) and gypsum (0.5, 1, and 1.5%) were employed for determining the unconfined compression strength (UCS) and CBR of stabilized CG mixes. An experimental study comprising 384 datasets was conducted and the resulting database was used to develop the ANN and RF regression models. Lime content, gypsum dosage, and 28 d curing period were considered as three input attributes in obtaining three outputs (i.e., UCS, unsoaked CBR, and soaked CBR). While modelling with the ANN technique, different algorithms, hidden layers, and the number of neurons were studied while selecting the optimum model. In the case of RF regression modelling, optimal grid comprising maximal depth of tree, number of trees, confidence, random splits, enabled parallel execution, and guess subset ratio were investigated, alongside the variable number of folds, to obtain the best model. The optimum models obtained using the ANN approach manifested relatively better performance in terms of correlation coefficient values, equaling 0.993, 0.995, and 0.997 for UCS, unsoaked CBR and soaked CBR, respectively. Additionally, the MAE values were observed as 45.98 kPa, 1.41%, and 1.18% for UCS, unsoaked CBR, and soaked CBR, respectively. The models were also validated using 2-stage validation processes. In the first stage of validation of the model (using unseen 30% of the data), it was revealed that reliable performance of the models was attained, whereas in the second stage (parametric analysis), results were achieved which are corroborated with those in existing literature.

Indexed as

ANN modelchemical stabilizationcoal ganguegypsumlime dosagerandom forest model

Identifiers

PMID35744389
PMCPMC9230053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.