Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744190›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC): A State-of-the-Art Review.

Rahat Ullah, Yuan Qiang, Jawad Ahmad, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, Mohammed A El-Shorbagy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rahat UllahSchool of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-6974
Yuan QiangSchool of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China.
Jawad AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, Swedish College of Engineering and Technology, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-7158
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
Mohammed A El-ShorbagyDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8115-0638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interest of researchers in UHPC has increased over the past decade. It is crucial to understand the structural behavior of reinforced UHPC (R/UHPC) components under various loading conditions before they can be used as a replacement for conventional concrete. Although several studies on ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) have been conducted, the knowledge is scattered, and no one can easily judge the performance and methodology of UPHC. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the research studies already carried out on UHPC. The review focuses on the materials' physical and chemical composition, mechanical and durability characteristics, fire resistance, and environmental benefits of UHPC. Design considerations for effectively utilizing UHPC in structural elements are also presented. The best UHPFRC mixture is obtainable with a steel fiber content of 2-3% and a water-to-cement ratio of 0.2-0.3. The review also discusses the essentials recommendation for future research on UHPC.

Indexed as

durability aspectsfibersmechanical strengthsecondary cementitious materialsultra-high-performance concrete

Identifiers

PMID35744190
PMCPMC9228538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.