Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744187›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Applicability Assessment of Different Materials for Standards Ensuring Comparability of Optical and Tactile Coordinate Measurements.

Wiktor Harmatys, Piotr Gąska, Adam Gąska, Maciej Gruza, Michał Jedynak, Konrad Kobiela, Michael Marxer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wiktor HarmatysLaboratory of Coordinate Metrology, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawla II 37, 31-864 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1188-3374
Piotr GąskaDepartment of Manufacturing Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Adam GąskaLaboratory of Coordinate Metrology, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawla II 37, 31-864 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2178-3919
Maciej GruzaLaboratory of Coordinate Metrology, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawla II 37, 31-864 Krakow, Poland.
Michał JedynakLaboratory of Coordinate Metrology, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawla II 37, 31-864 Krakow, Poland.
Konrad KobielaLaboratory of Coordinate Metrology, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawla II 37, 31-864 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8610-8247
Michael MarxerInstitute for Production Metrology, Materials and Optics, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, Werdenbergstrasse 4, 9471 Buchs, SG, Switzerland.
Cracow University of Technology · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLOstschweizer Fachhochschule OST · CH

Funding

Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej PPI/APM/2018/1/00027/U/001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensor CMMs are systems with an established position on the market, but their popularity still grows, as they provide access to the advantages offered by tactile and contactless measurement methods. Yet there are still questions of the comparability of results obtained using the optical and tactile operation modes of multisensor system. This phenomenon can be assessed by measuring appropriate gauges, most often reference rings or spheres. Due to the completely different nature of probing processes for tactile and contactless measurements, the material from which reference object is made may significantly affect measurement results. In order to assess the influence of this factor on measurement accuracy, three reference spheres made from different materials were measured on optical multisensor CMMs. Measurements involved tactile measurements as well as optical measurements made using different probing systems: a video probe and white light sensor. Results obtained from performed experiments show large differences depending on the material used for spherical standard production. On the basis of obtained results, it can be stated that the best material for a reference object that can be used for comparability tests of tactile and optical measurements is a composite of alumina with at least one oxidic additive.

Indexed as

accuracycoordinate measuring machinemultisensor measurementoptical measurementsvideo probewhite light sensor

Identifiers

PMID35744187
PMCPMC9227500
OpenAlexW4281771055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.