ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Interlayer Bond Strength Testing in 3D-Printed Mineral Materials for Construction Applications.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Comparison of Porosity and Thermal Conductivity of Concrete and Alkali-Activated Hybrid Binders in 3D-Printed Fiber-Reinforced Foamed Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Materials-Influence of Application Time of Subsequent Layers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Upscaling of Copper Slag-Based Geopolymer to 3D Printing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimization of Foams-Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Mixtures Dedicated for 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Use of Innovative Methods to Produce Highly Insulating Walls Using 3D-Printing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Feasibility Review of Aerated Materials Application in 3D Concrete Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Influence of the In-Fill Pattern of the 3D Printed Building Wall on Its Thermal Insulation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Metal and Polymer Based Composites Manufactured Using Additive Manufacturing-A Brief Review.Polymers · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of Polymer Additives in Concrete for 3D Concrete Printing Using Fly Ash.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are no standards for testing the properties of 3D-printed materials; hence, the need to develop guidelines for implementing this type of experiment is necessary. The work concerns the development of a research methodology for interlayer bond strength evaluation in 3D-printed mineral materials. In additive manufactured construction elements, the bond strength is a significant factor as it determines the load-bearing capacity of the entire structural element. After we completed a literature review, the following three test methods were selected for consideration: direct tensile, splitting, and shear tests. The paper compares the testing procedure, results, and sample failure modes. The splitting test was found to be the most effective for assessing layer adhesion, by giving the lowest scatter of results while being an easy test to carry out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.