Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744149›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Experimental Case Studies about Uniplanar SHS Joints with Full-Overlapped Top Connection.

Patrick Heinemann, Dorina-Nicolina Isopescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick HeinemannDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 1, Prof. Dr. Docent Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., No. 59A, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Dorina-Nicolina IsopescuDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 1, Prof. Dr. Docent Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., No. 59A, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7530-7929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squared hollow steel profiles are commonly used in the construction of offshore structures or building facades. By welding two or more pipes, typical joints are created that are specific for different areas of applications. These joints are less resistant than straight pipes due to the geometrical heterogeneity and the complex stress behavior of the welding. Standards define these joints, but there are restrictions imposed regarding the material or geometry. This paper focused on full-overlapped joints with squared hollow section profiles and on-top connection, which are disregarded in current standards. The aim was to figure out the influence of the inclination angle on the resistance of the joint. In the analysis, experimental and numerical studies were performed. Four different inclination angles commonly used on construction sites were the focus. It was discovered that there is a total diminishment of 46% in the load bearing capacity between the steepest and the most obtuse angles. The structural behavior is non-linear and is influenced by the value of the angles. The second aspect is related to the influence of the steel profile, which is evaluated by a comparison between a squared profile and two circular profiles. It was discovered that the joint made with squared profiles has a higher bearing capacity than the one made with circular profiles, a statement valid for similar thicknesses of the elements.

Indexed as

constructionhollow sectionsnumerical simulationsteelwelding line

Identifiers

PMID35744149
PMCPMC9227838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.