ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Long-Term Assessment of Contemporary Ion-Releasing Restorative Dental Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of bioactive alkasite-based material in different application modes: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.Odontology · 2025Trial
- Clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of low-shrinkage giomer resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in cervical carious lesions: a 12-month randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2023Trial
- How does thermocycling affect the surface properties of ion-releasing bulk‑fill resin composites?European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Effect of Simulated Gastric Acid on the Surface Properties of Different Fluoride-Releasing Dental Restorative Materials.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- An in vitro comparison of color stability between alkasite and different restorative materials in various staining solutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Repair Bond Strength of Ion-Releasing Versus Conventional Resin Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Alkasite Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Bioactive and Ion-releasing materials in minimum intervention dentistry: a clinical pathway from prevention to restorative treatment.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- The effects of bleaching products on the color stability of ion-releasing restoratives.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Elemental and micromorphological analysis of ion releasing restoration/carious dentin interface.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Proposal of a Modular Classification System for Direct Dental Resin Composites Based on Clinical Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Evaluation of bond durability of different self-adhesive bioactive restorative systems to dentin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Elemental analysis and micromorphological patterns of tooth/restoration interface of three ion-releasing class V restorations.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Fluoride release and flexural strength of four ion-releasing restorative materials: An in vitro comparative study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Review
- Mechanical Properties of Alkasite Material with Different Curing Modes and Simulated Aging Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In-vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth restored with different high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative materials and bulk-fill composite resins.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of polymerization mode on shrinkage kinetics and degree of conversion of dual-curing bulk-fill resin composites.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate new commercially available ion-releasing restorative materials and compare them to established anti-cariogenic materials. Four materials were tested: alkasite Cention (Ivoclar Vivadent) in self-cure or light-cure mode, giomer Beautifil II (Shofu), conventional glass-ionomer Fuji IX (GC), and resin composite Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent) as a control. Flexural strength, flexural modulus, and Weibull modulus were measured one day, three months, and after three months with accelerated aging in ethanol. Water sorption and solubility were evaluated for up to one year. Degree of conversion was measured during 120 min for self-cured and light-cured Cention. In this study, Beautifil II was the ion-releasing material with the highest flexural strength and modulus and with the best resistance to aging. Alkasite Cention showed superior mechanical properties to Fuji IX. Weibull analysis showed that the glass-ionomer had the least reliable distribution of mechanical properties with the highest water sorption. The solubility of self-cured alkasite exceeded the permissible values according to ISO 4049. Degree of conversion of light-cured Cention was higher than in self-cure mode. The use of alkasite Cention is recommended only in the light-cure mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.