Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743890›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses from Electron Beam Radiotherapy.

Natalia Matuszak, Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska, Agnieszka Skrobala, Adam Ryczkowski, Piotr Romanski, Igor Piotrowski, Katarzyna Kulcenty, Wiktoria Maria Suchorska, Julian Malicki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Out of field scatter from electron applicator in modern linear accelerators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  2. Monte Carlo methods to assess biological response to radiation in peripheral organs and in critical organs near the target.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia MatuszakDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Marta Kruszyna-MochalskaDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2216-3129
Agnieszka SkrobalaDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Adam RyczkowskiDepartment of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-5152
Piotr RomanskiDepartment of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8522-3542
Igor PiotrowskiDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4985-9321
Katarzyna KulcentyRadiobiology Laboratory, Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-249X
Wiktoria Maria SuchorskaDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-2465
Julian MalickiDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-5558
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLGreater Poland Cancer Center · PL

Funding

National Science Centre of Poland 2015/19/B/NZ7/03811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical radiotherapy, the most important aspects are the dose distribution in the target volume and healthy organs, including out-of-field doses in the body. Compared to photon beam radiation, dose distribution in electron beam radiotherapy has received much less attention, mainly due to the limited range of electrons in tissues. However, given the growing use of electron intraoperative radiotherapy and FLASH, further study is needed. Therefore, in this study, we determined out-of-field doses from an electron beam in a phantom model using two dosimetric detectors (diode E and cylindrical Farmer-type ionizing chamber) for electron energies of 6 MeV, 9 MeV and 12 MeV. We found a clear decrease in out-of-field doses as the distance from the field edge and depth increased. The out-of-field doses measured with the diode E were lower than those measured with the Farmer-type ionization chamber at each depth and for each electron energy level. The out-of-field doses increased when higher energy megavoltage electron beams were used (except for 9 MeV). The out-of-field doses at shallow depths (1 or 2 cm) declined rapidly up to a distance of 3 cm from the field edge. This study provides valuable data on the deposition of radiation energy from electron beams outside the irradiation field.

Indexed as

electron beamsnontarget dosesout-of-field dosesradiation scattering

Identifiers

PMID35743890
PMCPMC9225003
OpenAlexW4281716672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.