ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Evaluation of a Proportional-Integral-Derivative Controller for Hemorrhage Resuscitation Using a Hardware-in-Loop Test Platform.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Controller Logics for Automating Vasopressor Administration Using a Hardware-in-Loop Test Platform.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hardware-in-Loop Comparison of Physiological Closed-Loop Controllers for the Autonomous Management of Hypotension.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An Automated Hardware-in-Loop Testbed for Evaluating Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation Controllers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death in trauma, which can often be avoided with proper fluid resuscitation. Fluid administration can be cognitive-demanding for medical personnel as the rates and volumes must be personalized to the trauma due to variations in injury severity and overall fluid responsiveness. Thus, automated fluid administration systems are ideal to simplify hemorrhagic shock resuscitation if properly designed for a wide range of hemorrhage scenarios. Here, we highlight the development of a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller using a hardware-in-loop test platform. The controller relies only on an input data stream of arterial pressure and a target pressure; the PID controller then outputs infusion rates to stabilize the subject. To evaluate PID controller performance with more than 10 controller metrics, the hardware-in-loop platform allowed for 11 different trauma-relevant hemorrhage scenarios for the controller to resuscitate against. Overall, the two controller configurations performed uniquely for the scenarios, with one reaching the target quicker but often overshooting, while the other rarely overshot the target but failed to reach the target during severe hemorrhage. In conclusion, PID controllers have the potential to simplify hemorrhage resuscitation if properly designed and evaluated, which can be accomplished with the test platform shown here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.